Quitting and the Publishing Dream: When Quitting Might be a Good Plan
14
May
So getting published is brutal. Nigh on impossible. Anyone who has attempted the gauntlet of agents and publishers knows it (except for those savants who find publishing auctions and bestseller status and critical acclaim right out of the gate. I hate you. Congrats!)

It’s rational then to think about quitting. Sure, we’re told all the aphorisms and pithy support sentences from fellow writers and those who have never wrote a word: Keep trying! You can do it! Never quit! Never give up! Never say die! Never surrender! Which only goes to emphasize the notion of the entire process as waging a battle or war that is lopsided and a foregone conclusion.
What happens when we look critically at the idea of quitting our publishing aspirations? In creative circles, the goal is always to keep working, keep positive, and keep inspired. So it becomes slightly rebellious to think realistically, consciously, purposely about giving up. Maybe, just maybe, quitting is the smart move.
Let me back up. As some of you know from my posts here, I finished my first novel last year. For the past 6 months or so I’ve sent said novel out to agents representing this type of fiction. And for the past 6 months I have received rejections in return. So yes, I am in that juncture where quitting seems like a cross between the devil on my shoulder and sweet relief, like the longing to slip into warm sleep when hypothermic, sleep that also means submission to death.
But here’s the thing. I think quitting can be a judicious choice, one made on purpose and not forced by circumstance, and one that can lead to greater things in the future. All of us bookworms are constantly regaled by tales from any author worth their salt about their long path to publishing, one filled with rejection, abandoned drafts, and more. Sometimes, those abandoned drafts are quit to move on to better ideas and stories. Years down the line, when that author was published and successful, they returned to those stories and were able to bring them to the light of day.
My idea of quitting is this. I’ve given this book some time. I know realistically that this first novel of mine was in many ways an experiment, one that may still be amateurish, not ready for public consumption. I know also that I’ve learned tremendously from writing that novel. So this summer I plan to quit. I plan to put this finished book to the side, and begin another story that’s been percolating in my brain. I believe this book will be richer from my experiences in writing and submitting my first novel, and perhaps it might even be the one to get published. If not, maybe the next will. And sometime down the road, whether in a few months or a few years, I’ll return to this first novel. I’ll work on it with all that I’ve learned and lived. And damn, that novel will be good.
I’m going to quit. But I’m not going to quit from my publishing aspirations altogether. I’m merely going to quit this current iteration and effort, and move on to the next. Through this act of quitting, I think that I might one day find success.
What do you think? Is quitting a good idea? Is it a cop out?
Like this post? Fantastic! Leave a comment, submit it to your favorite bookmarking site, and don’t forget to subscribe by RSS or email.
1. Evelyn | May 15th, 2008 at 9:38 am
I found your blog through a post on Sharon Hurley Hall’s GPTW blog & I like it.
Thanks
2. Charlie Gilkey | Productive Flourishing | May 15th, 2008 at 10:21 am
Somewhat of a wayward comment here (but that’s normal for me). As Tolkien was working on the tales of Middle Earth, he shared the story with some of his friends. At the time, people weren’t really interested in what he was doing, but they were really interesting in…hobbits. So Tolkien completed The Hobbit and made a name for himself there. But then people wanted to hear more of the Tales of Middle Earth - so LOTR emerged.
But LOTR was just a piece of the Silmirralion, which was actually Tolkien’s crown jewel and what he had been working on the whole time. And Nerd reality was changed forever…
(I cannot verify the accuracy of this story - I remember reading it from J.R.T., but I know not where and I may be fuzzy on the details.)
My point: sometimes it’s better to quit actively working on one thing and start actively working on another. Just because you’re not actively working on something doesn’t mean you’ve quit working on it, especially when you’re dealing with creative work. At least that’s what I tell Angela when I have 14 projects strewn all over the house that are all percolating at once.
But, on the other hand, sometimes we do just need to quit a project, pack it up, and move on. Especially since it’s the process in so many creative endeavors that is important and not the product, and projects that need to be nixed are taking up the time that could be devoted to the process of creating other things.
Sorry for the long comment. It got caught somewhere between too short for a one-liner but not enough for a trackback post.
3. Sherree Geyer | May 15th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
Perhaps, “hiatus” not “quit” is more appropo here.
On a completely different note: I’d love to hear your thoughts on per-word article fees. A colleague just gave my name to an editor he works with who typically pays $400 for 2,000 words on technical topics. To add insult to injury, said editor typically pays between 30-60 days after invoicing. Hmm, 60 days for .20/word. It might make more economic sense to sling burgers at Micky D’s, but what do you think? How low will you go?
If you’ve addressed this before, please feel free to direct me to that blog. If not, this may be fodder for another “rant” blog.
4. Amy | May 15th, 2008 at 6:17 pm
@Evelyn - thanks, and welcome!
@Charlie - I love it. “Nerd reality was changed forever.” I think I heard something similar about LOTR. Nice distinction too - quitting for a time, and fully quitting. I agree there are times when its necessary for both. In my case, I’m quitting for a time.
@Sherree - ah ha! That’s the word I’m looking for. I’m on a “hiatus.” Gracias! And regarding per-word article fees - terrific topic for a post. Generally, I will go low on the fees if the legwork is less than other assignments, if I think I will get repeat business/client relationship out of it, or I’m, ahem, desperate. I do my best to stay away from that latter state. I’ll think about this a bit more and get a post going!
5. Elizabeth McQuern | May 15th, 2008 at 8:46 pm
An insufficient comment to such a dense post: that’s an amazing accompanying image. Where did you find it?
6. Amy | May 16th, 2008 at 8:56 am
@Elizabeth - I know! I found it on flickr by searching for writing and rejection. It’s a public image.
7. Roger | May 20th, 2008 at 8:19 am
Don’t stop, keep going right away with the next one.
I wrote a novel that was *almost* accepted thirty years ago and I stopped because of so many rejections (the bad news meant more than the good news of course) and could never summon up the courage to write, starting from nothing, again. Don’t stop - hiatuses can last years.
8. Amy | May 21st, 2008 at 11:15 am
@Roger - great point, and thanks for the encouragement.
9. Editor, The SciTech Journal | May 21st, 2008 at 11:26 pm
NICE ARTICLE. THANKS FOR SHARING. THOROUGHLY ENJOYED READING. GOOD LUCK
Thumbs Up to you 